Menu Secondary

Aidwa
AIDWA
  • About AIDWA
  • Events
  • What we do
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • NewsLetters
  • Press Releases
search
menu
  • About Aidwa
  • Events
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Magazines
  • Resources
  • Reports
  • Publications
  • Posters
  • What We Do
  • Food and Health
  • Women and Work
  • Gender Violence
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Communalism
  • Legal Intervention
  • Media Portrayal
About us
Contact us
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu

On SC Verdict on Two-Child Norm

10 Aug 2003
THE Supreme Court judgement upholding the two-child norm for contesting panchayat elections is in contradiction to the Cairo declaration, to which India is a signatory, and to the National Population Policy charter that eschews coercive methods in population control.
THE Supreme Court judgement upholding the two-child norm for contesting panchayat elections is in contradiction to the Cairo declaration, to which India is a signatory, and to the National Population Policy charter that eschews coercive methods in population control. By giving its stamp of approval on laws of some state governments that are highly discriminatory in nature, it justifies the extension of economic and social inequality to democratic process, creating an underclass that is deprived of the basic right to participate in elected decision making bodies.
 
There can be no quarrel with the court's rejection of the preposterous plea made by some complainants that since they had the right to four wives the two-child norm could not be applied to them.
 
However, the reasoning given by the court goes far beyond this objectionable plea, since it justifies disincentives to control family size as being "in the national interest." The court's perception of the 'national interest' ignores the interests of the majority who make up the nation. Global experience, as also the experience of our own country, shows that family size is linked to factors like control of infant mortality, poverty eradication, literacy, access to safe contraception and so on. When these issues are tackled, as is the example of Kerala, then couples opt for a smaller family. In the absence of such measures, a regime of disincentives is actually punishing the poor for their poverty. The Supreme Court judgement has wider implications that are a throwback to the logic of Emergency days when coercive methods of sterilization were justified as being in the 'national interest.' It gives sanction to and opens the floodgate for cruel strategies employed by many state governments of depriving poor families who have more than two children, of government benefits including ration cards, government jobs and so on.
 
In a country where there is a skewed sex ratio based on cultures of son-preference, a two-child norm will lead to further distortions. In many cases women have little choice over family size and therefore are being punished for factors beyond their control.
 
We oppose the judgement of the Supreme Court. We demand that parliament reassert the basic premise of the Cairo declaration and the National Population Policy against coercion, disincentives and targets.

More Stories

  • INTERNATIONAL Women’s Day on March 8, 2018 was organised in 22 states in the country. Thousands of women participated in all these programmes.
    Mariam Dhawale
    AIDWA Holds Multifarious Programmes on International Women’s Day
    13 Mar 2018
    International Women’s Day (IWD) was observed for a whole week as ‘International Women’s Week’ in Delhi. A state level rally was organised jointly with 31 organisations on March 8 but AIDWA also held…
  • AIDWA’S SAVE INDIA CONVENTION  WOMEN CALL FOR A UNITED STRUGGLE AGAINST REGRESSIVE POLITICS
    Mariam Dhawale
    Women call for a United Struggle against Regressive Politics
    15 Dec 2017
    The statement above sums up the spirit and the core focus of AIDWA’s Save India Convention on Assault against Women’s Citizenship Rights which was held in Mavlankar Hall, New Delhi on December 8,…
  • Moturu Udayam
    Moturu Udayam
    01 Nov 2017
    Born on October 13, 1924 into a progressive family, she was married at 14 to communist activist Moturu Hanumantha Rao. The couple faced financial hardships and lost two of their children. Udayam…
  • Niruben Patel
    Niruben Patel
    01 Nov 2017
    Born in 1926, Niruben Patel abandoned her school at the call of Gandhiji, to later rejoin. She went on to complete her MA from Elphinston College, Bombay. She became a member of the Communist Party,…
  • Kalpana Dutta
    Kalpana Dutta
    01 Nov 2017
    Born in Chittagong district (now Bangladesh) on 27 July 1913. While studying at Bethune College in Calcutta, she was inspired to join the Chhatri Sangha, and was drawn into the revolutionary circle…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us